The eSOURCE-READINESS ASSESSMENT TOOL (eSRA)

The tool contains questions based on regulations and regulatory agency guidelines for clinical research data sources and should be used to evaluate the suitability of an Investigator Site computerized system to provide data for clinical trials. An eClinical Forum team, comprised of CRAs and Data Managers from different clinical research sponsor organizations and CROs and representatives from sites, has produced the "eSource-Readiness Assessment", otherwise known as "eSRA" for sites to perform a self-assessment of their computerized system's ability to be compliant with clinical research regulations.

Clinical research draws on a combination of data collected during a clinical trial and historical medical information relating to the research subject(s). Many of the data points needed for clinical research are originating in Electronic Health Record Systems, making them "eSource" for clinical research. Even if these data points are not used directly from the site's healthcare system, but are re-entered into a Sponsor's system for a clinical trial, the source of the information (the healthcare system) must still be confirmed as compliant with standards set forth in clinical research regulations and applicable guidance documents.

The eSRA Questionnaire Version 2024 can be downloaded as part of the eSRA Handbook below.  (This version incorporates changes based on the EMA Guideline on computerised systems and electronic data in clinical trials.)

Notice to those intending to include eSRA in their own materials: Copyrighted by the eClinical Forum 2024. The eClinical Forum keeps all rights of this material. Please see the License for Fair Use in the eSRA Handbook and “Implementing eSRA” Guide. We welcome eSRA to be used in other formats, however, it is required that eSRA text be used exactly, that all eSRA questions are included, that your use of eSRA is updated when eCF eSRA is updated, and that eClinical Forum is notified in writing and credited. By using these materials, you acknowledge the terms and conditions for use.  The eClinical Forum is only responsible for the eSRA materials as distributed via the eClinical Forum website. If using the eCF form, downloaded from this website, in it's original format, there is no need to notify eCF.

Stay Current!!

As new regulations are released or updated, the eClinical Forum will evaluate if the eSRA questions should be updated. To be notified of future releases of the eSRA Questionnaire, please send an email to eSRA@eClinicalForum.org. Your email address will not be used for purposes other than to inform you of updates to eSRA.

Sponsors & CROS -- Please take our very brief survey regarding how you are using eSRA.  This will help us improve eSRA. Survey link: eCF eSRA Survey (eclinicalforum.org) THANK YOU!!!

Do we keep a list of sites that have completed eSRAs?

We have frequently been asked if we can provide a list of which sites have already completed an eSRA. Due to privacy laws in different countries, eClinical Forum does not keep such a list. We supply the eSRA questionnaire, free of charge, to anyone who wants to use it. We encourage sponsors to keep a list for themselves of which sites they have received a completed eSRA from. We encourage sites to store their completed eSRA in a central location (such as their IT department) so that other groups within the same organization / using the same electronic healthcare system, can use the completed eSRA as a basis to complete their own eSRA.

eSRA RESOURCES – Scroll to see all resources

THE USE OF ELECTRONIC SOURCE DOCUMENTATION - V1.1 May 2003

Published on 12 May 2003

THE USE OF ELECTRONIC SOURCE DOCUMENTATION - V1.1 May 2003

This 13-page position paper on eSource (source data that has been captured by an electronic tool which is a replacement for paper) describes the regulatory environment for the ultimate benefit of all stakeholders involved in EDC.

eSource has been selected as a priority because of recently conducted surveys on the impact of EDC on Investigational sites. These surveys have revealed that the workload at sites using EDC may increase, despite the easier data entry that is being reported. The reason is linked to dissatisfaction with the multiple data entry being demanded due in part to the lack of clarity on the level of acceptance of eSource. For example, where patient data are being recorded in legitimate clinic electronic source records before being entered into the sponsor’s EDC system, some sponsors appear to be demanding the creation of additional paper records to act as source for the purposes of Source Data verification.

The position paper regarding eSource presents the general consensus of the EDM Forum rather than individual organisations. The paper was prepared as a response to ‘Draft Guidance for Industry: Part 11, Electronic Records, Electronic Signatures – Scope and Application’ in the expectation that the clarification of electronic source data would strongly support adoption of electronic technologies and reduce the cost of current EDC implementations.

Thes position paper details:

  1. The EDMF definition of eSource, including
    • Electronic Patient/Hospital Records
    • Self-Assessment/Diary Data
    • E-CRF Data
    • Derived Electronic Data – Laboratory Results, ECG, EEG
  2. The potential advantages and potential disadvantages of eSource
    • How eSource can objectively monitor patient safety and improve potential fraud identification
    • Our understanding of the current regulatory environment and the regulatory implications of eSource
Comments (0)Number of views (2170)

Author: Webmaster1

Categories: PUBLIC DOWNLOADS, Survey Results

Tags:

Print

Documents to download