WHO WE ARE

The eClinical Forum is a global network of peers. It provides a non‐competitive environment for innovation, learning and collaboration in clinical research.

 

NEWS FROM THE ECF

eSRA was used in a Japanese research paper on data quality of medical information systems

Japan Society for Medical Informatics

eSRA was used in a Japanese research paper on data quality of medical information systems

Medical Informatics, a publication of the Japan Society for Medical Informatics, published an article which used eSRA to assess the requirements of the Japan MHLW's "Guideline on security management for medical information systems."

Public Release: Audit Trail Review: Key Tool to Ensure Data Integrity Version 1.0

An Industry Position Paper

Public Release: Audit Trail Review: Key Tool to Ensure Data Integrity Version 1.0

The Society for Clinical Data Management (SCDM) and eClinical Forum (eCF) Joint Task Force are pleased to announce the publication of an industry position paper “AUDIT TRAIL REVIEW: A KEY TOOL TO ENSURE DATA INTEGRITY” final version based on Industry Feedback.  With various electronic data capture modalities becoming the norm and the growing regulatory focus on data collection traceability, audit trails which capture the who, what, when, and why of electronic data entry and amendments are a critical tool.  This paper outlines an industry perspective on maximizing the value of implementing the targeted, routine review of these extremely large datasets. It provides recommendations on risk-based use cases for audit trail review (ATR) and the corresponding desired reporting criteria, with suggestions on when to use visualizations and exception report listings to generate key, actionable insights.

Principal Investigators’ Signatures

Aligning the existing eCF best practices document with the most recent regulatory expectations

Principal Investigators’ Signatures

Aligning the existing eCF best practices document with the most recent regulatory expectations

Position Paper: Trial Master File Archiving and the Decommissioning of Computerised Systems Used in Clinical Trials, PR1

Position Paper: Trial Master File Archiving and the Decommissioning of Computerised Systems Used in Clinical Trials, PR1

The eClinical Forum is happy to announce the public release of a position paper titled “Decentralized TMF Archives and The Decommissioning Of Computerised Systems Used In Clinical Trials”.  This position paper was written by a joint task force from EUCROF and the eClinical Forum, with representatives from other industry associations including ECRIN, the ePRO consortium, Medicines for Europe and the RQA.

ABOUT THE POSITION PAPER: Following the completion of a clinical trial, the essential documents that make up the TMF (Trial Master File) are retained and archived by the sponsor, the investigator and, in some cases, sub-contractors to the sponsor and/or investigator. The position paper highlights 11 key positions: seven positions concerning the archiving of the TMF and four positions concerning the archiving of the electronic data. These positions address areas where regulatory expectations are not always seen as being aligned with industry practices.

NOT A MEMBER?

Visit the Membership page to learn 
How To Become a Member
(Join the eClinical Forum and learn how to leverage existing and emerging technologies for electronic clinical trials. Access an eClinical community, member-only knowledge, events and forums)
«September 2021»
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
2021
BoF Round-Table Discussion: "eClinical Standards - Best practices for implementing"

BoF Round-Table Discussion: "eClinical Standards - Best practices for implementing"

This is a round-table discussion. Participants are encouraged to share experiences, make comments, ask questions, and contribute to the discussion. We will be discussing: “Can we develop best practices for implementing standards across sponsors and CROs of all sizes to drive efficiencies that result in medical advancements getting to patients faster?”

  • Can we facilitate a mechanism to share standards across organizations to avoid process changes from one trial to the next?
  • Can we track standard utilization across organizations to be data driven about when and how updates are needed?
  • With the increase in digital trials, what additional standards should we be considering?
  • What does an optimal standards committee look like? 
Read more
2223242526
27282930123
45678910

Upcoming events Events RSSiCalendar export